Minnesota Public ...
  • Sign In
This Discussion channel is currently closed.

Discussion: Electric Vehicle Charging Tariffs | M-15-111 | M-15-112 | M-15-120

Notice

View Case Record, M-15-111

View Case Record, M-15-112

View Case Record, M-15-120

Subscribe to This Case

Comments must be received by 4:30pm on the close date.

Topics

Topic: Minnesota Power reported zero customers taking service under its electric vehicle (EV) tariff. Is this amount consistent with similarly situated electric utilities? If not, should the Commission make changes to the Company’s tariff and/or marketing strategy to increase participation?
2 Responses
View Topic
Topic: Otter Tail Power reported zero customers taking service under its EV tariff. Is this amount consistent with similarly situated electric utilities? If not, should the Commission make changes to the Company’s tariff and/or marketing strategy to increase participation?
1 Responses
View Topic
Topic: Xcel Energy reported 20 customers taking service under its EV tariff. Is this amount consistent with similarly situated electric utilities? If not, should the Commission make changes to the Company’s tariff and/or marketing strategy to increase participation?
13 Responses
View Topic
Topic: Are Xcel Energy’s promotional materials consistent with its EV tariff, which states, “Metering may be installed as a sub-meter behind the customer’s main meter…” (Term 1, at Section 5, Sheet 6)?
6 Responses
View Topic
Topic: Are there any lessons to be learned from the EV tariffs offered by the state’s customer-owned utilities?
3 Responses
View Topic
Topic: Any other issues or concerns related to the filings in the dockets, including, but not limited to, the renewable energy option filings made in December 2015?
0 Responses
View Topic