Minnesota Public Utilities Commission

This Discussion channel is currently closed.

Discussion: Revised Petition by Minnesota Power (MP) for a Competitive Rate for Energy-Intensive Trade-Exposed (EITE) Customers and an EITE Cost Recovery Rider | M-16-564

Notice of Reply Comment Period

View Case Record, M-16-564

Subscribe to This Case

Comments must be received by 4:30pm on the close date.

Topics

Topic: Should the Commission approve, modify or reject MP’s request for a competitive rate for Energy-Intensive Trade Exposed (EITE) customers and an EITE cost recovery rider?

76 Responses

View Topic

Topic: The Commission seeks reply comments regarding MP’s compliance filing and OAG’s comments.

0 Responses

View Topic

Topic: Please provide comments regarding any other issues relevant to the Commission’s review of MP’s petition.

3 Responses

View Topic

Sign Up

Participants