Comments must be received by 4:30pm on the close date.
This Discussion channel is currently closed.
Topic: Is it permissible for a cooperative electric association to require a customer to be compensated using the “kWh carry forward” method, Minn. Stat. §216B.164 Subd. 3(f)?
Topic: Does Minnesota Valley’s compensation option of “the kWh rate calculated from the Cooperative’s previous year’s average wholesale power cost figures” comply with Minn. Stat. §216B.164 Subd. 3(d) and Minn. Rules 7835.3300, Subd. 1?
Topic: If a customer installed a solar system prior to July 1, 2015 and expanded it after July 1, 2015, is all, part, or none of the combined system subject to the 2015 amendments to Minn. Stat. §216B.164?
Topic: Is it permissible for a utility to waive or reduce other fees to encourage QFs to elect a specific method of compensation for excess energy, such as the kWh carry forward method?