Minnesota Public ...
  • Sign In
This Discussion channel is currently closed.

Discussion: Petition of Xcel Energy for Approval of the Acquisition of Wind Energy | M-16-777

Notice

View Case Record, M-16-777

Subscribe to This Case

Comments must be received by 4:30pm on the close date.

Topics

Topic: Should the Commission approve Xcel’s proposed 1,550 MW of wind resource additions to theNSP system?
0 Responses
View Topic
Topic: Should the Commission authorize an aggregate, symmetrical cost cap for the four self-buildproject portfolio?
0 Responses
View Topic
Topic: Should the Commission determine that Xcel’s proposal to acquire 1,550 MW of wind resourcesis a reasonable and prudent approach to meetings its obligations under Minnesota’s RenewableEnergy Standard pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 216B.1645, subd. 1?
0 Responses
View Topic
Topic: Is the company’s proposal to deal with the jurisdictional cost allocation issues and cost recoveryof these projects reasonable? If not, what are reasonable options?
0 Responses
View Topic
Topic: Are there any other any other related issues or concerns?
0 Responses
View Topic
Topic: Is the acquisition of the Lake Benton II Project consistent with the public interest andshould the Commission approve the project pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 216B.50?
1 Responses
View Topic
Topic: Should the Commission grant a variance for the Lake Benton II Project from the filingrequirements provided in Minn. Rule 7825.1800 (B)?
0 Responses
View Topic