Topics

Topic: Is the purchase proposal prudent and in the public interest?

0 Responses

View Topic

Topic: What are all the assumptions/inputs used to develop the cost/benefit analysis? Are those assumptions/inputs consistent with Xcel’s stated goals to be carbon-free by 2050? Are those assumptions/inputs reasonable?

0 Responses

View Topic

Topic: Should Xcel Energy (Xcel) be allowed to recover the difference between the 2019 revenue requirement resulting from the transaction and the revenues already in base rates for the capacity portions of the current Mankato Energy Center (MEC I) and Mankato Energy Center (MEC II) PPAs?

0 Responses

View Topic

Topic: If the transaction is approved, how should cost recovery be effected?

0 Responses

View Topic

Topic: If the transaction is approved, will it require any rule variances and, if so, which rules should be varied?

0 Responses

View Topic

Topic: If the transaction is approved, how will it impact the 2019 Capital True-Up filing?

0 Responses

View Topic

Topic: If the transaction is approved, how will it impact Xcel’s capital structure?

0 Responses

View Topic

Topic: If the transaction is approved, how do the MEC I and MEC II useful lives fit with Xcel’s stated goal to be carbon-free by 2050?

0 Responses

View Topic

Topic: If Xcel becomes carbon-free by 2050, should ratepayers be liable for any resulting MEC I and MEC II related stranded costs?

0 Responses

View Topic

Topic: Should approval be subject to any conditions and, if so, what should those conditions be?

0 Responses

View Topic

Topic: What action should the Commission take regarding the request to transfer the site permit in this docket?

0 Responses

View Topic

Topic: Are there other issues or concerns related to this matter?

0 Responses

View Topic