This Discussion channel is currently closed.
Topic: What are all the assumptions/inputs used to develop the cost/benefit analysis? Are those assumptions/inputs consistent with Xcel’s stated goals to be carbon-free by 2050? Are those assumptions/inputs reasonable?
Topic: Should Xcel Energy (Xcel) be allowed to recover the difference between the 2019 revenue requirement resulting from the transaction and the revenues already in base rates for the capacity portions of the current Mankato Energy Center (MEC I) and Mankato Energy Center (MEC II) PPAs?
Topic: If the transaction is approved, will it require any rule variances and, if so, which rules should be varied?
Topic: If the transaction is approved, how do the MEC I and MEC II useful lives fit with Xcel’s stated goal to be carbon-free by 2050?
Topic: If Xcel becomes carbon-free by 2050, should ratepayers be liable for any resulting MEC I and MEC II related stranded costs?
Topic: What action should the Commission take regarding the request to transfer the site permit in this docket?