Comments must be received by 4:30pm on the close date. Comments received after after comment period closes will not be accepted.
This Discussion channel is currently closed.
Topic: Should the Commission, as Xcel Energy (Xcel) requests: Approve Xcel’s request to build, own, and operate the 302.4 MW Dakota Range wind project; Approve an aggregate, symmetrical capital cap for the initial construction of the project; Approve the use of Xcel’s Capital Services affiliate agreement for Dakota Range that was approved by the Commission in its July 13, 2017 Order in Docket No. 17-215; and Confirm the 302.4 MW proposed Dakota Range wind project is a reasonable and prudent way for Xcel to meet its obligations under the Minnesota Renewable Energy Standard?
Topic: Is Xcel’s proposal consistent with the Commission’s January 2017 Order in the Company’s integrated resource planning docket (Docket No. 15-21)?