Minnesota Public ...
  • Sign In
This Discussion channel is currently closed.

Discussion: Commission Investigation into Parameters for Competition among Natural Gas Utilities Involving Duplication of Facilities and Use of Promotional Incentives and Other Payments | CI-17-499

Notice

View Case Record, CI-17-499

Subscribe to This Case

Topics

Topic: How should the Commission evaluate and set the parameters of inter-gas-utility competition consistent with the provisions of Minn. Stat. § 216B.01?
0 Responses
View Topic
Topic: What criteria should the Commission use to evaluate whether there is unnecessary duplication of facilities as contemplated by Minn. Stat. § 216B.01? In addition, how should the Commission determine whether increased costs occur to existing customers, for both the utility proposing to construct duplicate facilities and the utility whose facilities are duplicated?
0 Responses
View Topic
Topic: How should the Commission regulate the use of promotional incentives and other tariffed and non-tariffed payments provided by utilities to extend their service to new areas or customers outside their existing service area?
0 Responses
View Topic
Topic: What should be considered as other non-tariffed payments, e.g., co-sponsored advertising arrangements?
0 Responses
View Topic
Topic: Should all natural gas utilities be required to file with the Commission copies of all their existing and new competitive service agreements (or similar agreements) with customers?
0 Responses
View Topic
Topic: Any other issue or topic relevant to this matter.
0 Responses
View Topic